Adjust station and backsight trimble business center
- #Adjust station and backsight trimble business center software#
- #Adjust station and backsight trimble business center series#
#Adjust station and backsight trimble business center software#
or Trimble Business Center or Trimble Access General Survey software Monitoring Job (for averaged coordinates). Set up your instrument on a known point or perform. Measure, key in or import target definitions and. Fixed stations: Only available, if the Integrity Monitor module is located below a GNSS processing engine (for example, the Integrated Survey Engine). Use the Import points wizard to import station, backsight and/or foresight points. At least two points must have control coordinates and be held fixed. It is the blunders that get you in trouble. Backsight points are pre-selected, but you may change the selection status. What you are primarily doing is trapping blunders, which can be any magnitude. The fact is that if your instrument and accessories are in decent adjustment the split between these redundant ties is going to be trivial.
Then you tie the boundary mark from your strategic control in the usual fashion.
Expand your job file and you can change the backsight point number for the station setup. I would import the control points and adjust.
#Adjust station and backsight trimble business center series#
And you want to tie the strategic point (stubbed out control) off your main traverse redundantly. In TBC, under Project Explorer go to Imported files. S series total station and Survey Pro, wrong backsight distance found in raw observations. You do want the distance from your main traverse control point to the strategic point to be equal to or greater than the distance from the strategic point to the boundary mark (ie/ you want the backsight at the strategic point to be equal to or greater than the foresight to the boundary mark. Setting a strategic control point off your main traverse, from which to tie some snookered boundary mark, is not a mortal sin. Nowadays with 3" least count instruments very common, automated multiple set turning, and computerized data reduction there isn't much, if anything, to be gained. Also, the math - pounded out on a calculator - was easier. Angles turned with such instruments just weren't super precise so you wanted to minimize the angles and rely on distances, which could be less of a problem. Putting a points on line between 2 control points of a traverse was a valid tactic when we where using transits with 1' and theodolites with 20" least counts. Appears to me that Jim does have a handle on what you are doing.